Misappropriation of Trade Secrets

December 2016

• Apple v Samsung – USSC: “US Supreme Court rules for Samsung on Apple patent case award” (FT, 12/6/16)
• Patent Trolls: “Apple-Nokia patent dispute highlights case for trolls” (FT, 12/22/16)

October 2016

• Apple v Samsung – USSC:
  • “Supreme Court hears Apple-Samsung patent case” (WSJ, 10/12/16)
  • “Supreme Court justices question big verdict against Samsung for copying Apple’s iPhone” (LAT, 10/11/16)

May 2016

• USSC Patent Cases: “Supreme Court limits where patent lawsuits can be filed” (WSJ, 5/22/17)

April 2016

• USSC Patent Cases: “Supreme Court grapples with rules on patent challenges” (WSJ, 4/25/16)

March 2016

• Apple v Samsung – USSC:
  • “Supreme Court to hear Samsung appeal in Apple patent case” (WSJ, 3/21/16)
  • “Supreme Court to hear Samsung appeal on Apple patent award” (NYT, 3/21/16)
  • “US Supreme Court agrees to hear part of Samsung appeal v Apple” (FT, 3/21/16)
  • “U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on damages in Apple-Samsung patent case” (LAT, 3/21/16)
• USSC Patent Cases:
  • [TOP TEN]“Supreme Court considers why patent trolls love Texas” (NYT, 3/27/17)

February 2016

• USSC Patent Cases: “Supreme Court weighs making larger patent-suit awards easier to win” (WSJ, 2/23/16)

December 2015

• $139.8M Patent Verdict (Power Integrations v Fairchild Semiconductor): “Jury awards $139.8M patent verdict” (LA Daily Journal, 12/18/15)
• Apple v Samsung Patent Infringement Litigation: “Samsung appeals patent case to justices” (NYT, 12/15/15)

September 2015

• Patent Reform: “States move to do-it-yourself patent reform” (WSJ, 9/4/15)

May 2015

• Apple-Samsung: “Apple damages at risk after Samsung patent case ruling” (FT, 5/19/15)
• Patent Reform: “Patent reform won’t hurt professors” (WSJ, 5/4/15)

April 2015

• Patent Trolls:  “A patent-troll bill with bad college grades” (WSJ, 4/15/15)
  

February 2015

• $533 million Verdict Against Apple in Patent Lawsuit: [TOP TEN]“Apple ordered to pay $533 million in iTunes patent lawsuit” (LAT, 2/26/15)

December 2014

• Cisco Patent’s Copyright Infringement Suit Against Arista Networks: “Cisco sues rival led by former executives” (WSJ, 12/05/14)

August 2014

• Apple vs Samsung Litigation:Patent Reform:
  • “Judge denies Apple’s request to ban Samsung phones, tablets” (WSJ, 8/28/14)
  • “Effort to overhaul patent law reset as latest bid stalls” (WSJ, 8/18/14)
  • “Samsung, Apple drop certain patent suits” (WSJ, 8/6/14)

July 2014

• Apple vs Samsung Litigation: “Apple bails on sales ban attempt” (LA Daily Journal, 7/30/14)
• Theft of Dupont Trade Secrets: “Man gets 15 years’ prison for stealing DuPont secrets” (Bloomberg, 7/10/14)
• US Supreme Court Review of Patent Cases: “Critics fault court’s grip on appeals for patents” (WSJ, 7/7/14)

June 2014

• Apple vs. Samsung Trial II:
  • “The great smartphone war” (Vanity Fair, June 2014)
  • “Courtroom victories lead nowhere” (FT, 6/20/14)
• Frivolous Patent Litigation:“Clarifying, and tightening, patent law” (NYT, 6/5/14)
• “Patent Troll” Litigation:
  • “The myth of the wicked patent troll” (WSJ, 6/30/14)
  • “Legislative victory for patent trolls” (LAT, 6/4/14)
• Stolen Computer Code Investigation:“KCG Holdings suspects its trading code was stolen” (WSJ, 6/4/14)
• USSC Decision re Software Patent: 
  • “High Court rejects abstract software patent” WSJ, 6/20/14)
  • “Justices deny patent to business methods” (NYT, 6/20/14)

May 2014

• Apple vs. Google Lawsuits: “Apple, Google end patent battle” (WSJ, 5/17/14)
• Apple vs. Samsung Trial II:
  • “Samsung does well in patent case” (LAT, 5/3/14)
  • “Samsung plans to appeal $119-million judgement in Apple patent case” (LAT, 5/7/14)
  • [TOP TEN] “After Apple-Samsung trial, jury weights Google’s influence” (WSJ, 5/6/14)
  • “Apple win won’t hurt Samsung– or Android” (WSJ, 5/5/14)
  • “Split verdict in Apple and Samsung patent feud” (NYT, 5/2/14)
  • “Could court ruling spark patent suits?” (WSJ, 5/1/14)
• “Patent Troll” Litigation:“Legislation to protect against ;patent trolls’ is shelved” (NYT, 5/22/14)

April 2014

• Apple vs. Samsung Trial II:
  • “Apple v. Samsung goes to jury” (LA Daily Journal, 4/30/14)
  • “Apple and Samsung cite, and rebut, internal memos in patent case” (NYT, 4/30/14)
  • “Appeals court weighs in on Apple” (WSJ, 4/26/14)
  • “Samsung takes a new approach” (LA Daily Journal, 4/21/14)
  • “Quinn duels with Apple damages expert in smartphone war” (LA Daily Journal, 4/14/14)
  • “The Apple chronicles” (NYT, 4/12/14)
  • “Another Apple, Samsung patent battle set to begin” (LAT, 4/1/14)
  • “Apple and Sumsung reprise patent fight (with Google a shadow presence)” (NYT, 4/2/14)
  • “Samsung goes after Apple’s $2B claim” LA Daily Journal, 4/2/14)
  • “Apple seeks leverage as trial opens” (LA Daily Journal, 4/1/14)
• Frivolous Patent Litigation:
  • “Justices address bogus patent suits” (WSJ, 4/30/14)
  • “Abusive and frivolous patent suit” (NYT, 4/7/14)
• US Supreme Court Case on Patents and Software (Alice Corp., D CLS Bank International):
  • “Tech industry opens a Pandora’s box of patent strife” (FT, 4/4/14)
  • “Justices skeptical on patents” (WSJ, 4/1/14)
  • “Supreme Court looks at patent for risk analysis” (LAT, 4/1/14)
  • “Justices seem wary of software patent case” (NYT, 4/1/14)

March 2014

• Apple Patent Infringement Litigation: “Patent claim against Apple dismissed by German court” (WSJ, 3/3/14)
• Apple vs. Samsung Litigation:
  • “Central to latest Apple suit: Google” (WSJ, 3/31/14)
  • “Apple’s war on Samsung has Google in crossfire” (NYT, 3/31/14)
• IP Settlement of Google-Viacom Copyright Lawsuit re YouTube: “Viacom and Google settle massive copyright lawsuit” (LAT, 3/19/14)
• US Supreme Court Case on Patents and Software (Alice Corp., D CLS Bank International): “Supreme Court steps into software-patent debate” (WSJ, 3/31/14)

February 2014

• Abusive Patent Lawsuit by “Patent Trolls”: “A Supreme Court Patent case comes down to a war of adjectives” (NYT, 2/27/14)
• Apple vs. Samsung Patent Litigation: “Apple, Samsung  fail to settle patent case” (WSJ, 2/24/14)
• Patent Infringement Lawsuiits and Stock Price Fluctuation:  “The case against Palo Alto’s stock” (WSJ, 2/27/14)

January 2014

• Theft of Trade Secrets Trial (Liew/DuPont): “Corporate espionage trial starts” (LA Daily Journal, 1/9/14)

December 2013

• Apple v. Samsung:
  • “Jimmy Carter’s costly patent mistake” (WSJ, 12/16/13)
  • “Apple seeks $15.7 million from Samsung for fees” (WSJ, 12/9/13)

November 2013

• Apple v. Samsung:
  • “Apple wins $290 million in ruling” (WSJ, 11/22/13)
  • “Jury orders Samsung to pay Apple $290 million” (LAT, 11/22/13)
  • “Apple and Samsung return to court” (LAT, 11/14/13)
  • “Jury decide how much more Samsung must pay apple in patent case” (NYT, 11/12/13)
• Cyber Attacks and Theft of Intellectual Property: “Symantec chief issues alert over cyber theft” (FT, 11/26/13)
• Patent Trolls: “A bipartisan plan to clean up the patent mess” (WSJ, 11/15/13)
• Patent Wars and Use of Litigation: “Patent war flares anew” (WSJ, 11/4/13)

October 2013

• Apple v. Samsung:
  • “Quinn says firm inadvertently let Apple-Nokia licensing terms slip” (LA Daily Journal, 10/23/13)
  • “Obama rejects Samsung plea over patents” (FT, 10/9/13)
  • “US upholds ban of Samsung sales in patent battle” (WSJ, 10/9/13)
• Patent Law Reform: “Patent-law bomb still ticks” (WSJ, 10/28/13)
• Patent Trolls:
  • “US plans to crack down on patent ‘trolls’” (FT, 10/21/13)
  • “Extracting a toll from a patent ‘troll’” (NYT, 10/18/13)
• Theft of Source Code indictment (Flow Traders): “New York indicts three for alleged code theft” (WSJ, 10/8/13)

September 2013

• Court Appointment of Special Masters: “Judges turn to outsourcing as cases get more complex” (WSJ, 9/30/13)
• FTC Investigation of Patent Troll Business: “FTC votes for inquiry into patent businesses” (NYT, 9/28/13)
• Globalization of patent infringement lawsuits: “Tech giants fear spread of patent wars to Europe” (NYT, 9/27/13)
• NY Task Force Recommendations re High-Tech Theft: “A call for new laws in New York to fight high-tech crime” (NYT, 9/25/13)

August 2013

• Apple/Samsung Patent Infringement Litigation:
  • “Apple wins patent ruling over Samsung” (LAT, 8/10/13)
  • “US Panel orders import ban on some Samsung devices” (WSJ, 8/11/13)
  • “Apple faces three major legal showdowns Friday” (LAT, 8/9/13)
  • “Apple-Samsung patent battle heads for next round” (WSJ, 8/9/13)
  • “Patent case has potential to give Apple upper hand” (NYT, 8/9/13)
  • “Obama patent move caps new Apple march on Washington” (FT, 8/8/13)
  • “Obama veto leaves patents under a cloud” (FT, 8/8/13)
  • “Apple notches fresh patent win” (WSJ, 8/8/13)
  • “Seoul hits at Obama’s Apple veto in patent dispute” (FT, 8/6/13)
  • “Apple’s modest win in the patent wars” (FT, 8/6/13)
  • “White House veto raises stakes in Apple-Samsung patent dispute” (LAT, 8/6/13)
  • “Veto of Apple ruling likely to upend big patent battles” (WSJ, 8/5/13)
  • “Apple/Samsung: patent nonsense” (FT, 8/5/13)
  • “Apple import veto risks undermining patent protection push” (FT, 8/5/13)
  • “Obama administration overturns ban on some Apple products in rare intervention” (NYT, 8/4/13)
• Theft of Source Code at automated trading firm (Flow Traders US): “Theft of trading code is alleged” (WSJ, 8/26/13)

July 2013

• Apple/Samsung Patent Infringement Litigation:
  • “Samsung vs. Apple needs an Obama intervention” (WSJ, 7/24/13)
  • “Apple, Samsung deal elusive” (WSJ, 7/20/13)
• Criminal Theft of Trade Secrets (Chinese Company: Sinovel):
  • “Four international units to close in latest setback” (WSJ, 7/3/13)
  • “US looks to blunt espionage by corporate firms” (WSJ, 7/1/13)
• Cyber Theft of Trade Secrets (China):“US, firms draw a bead on Chinese cyberspies” (WSJ, 7/12/13)
• Patent Litigation and “Patent Trolls”:
  • “Inventive at least in court” (NYT, 7/17/13)
  • “How a typical patent battle took a surprising turn” (NYT, 7/14/13)
  • “Has patent. Will sue: An alert to corporate America” (NYT, 7/14/13)

June 2013

• Apple/Samsung Patent Infringement Litigation:
  • “Is Obama a smartphone peacemaker?” (WSJ, 6/9/13)
  • “Patent ruling feeds Samsung’s rising confidence” (FT, 6/6/13)
  • “Obama’s call in Apple-Samsung scrap” (FT, 6/6/13)
  • “Legal ruling won’t bruise Apple’s skin” (WSJ, 6/6/13)
• Cyber Theft of Trade Secrets (China):
  • “White House attacks China over hacking” (FT, 6/7/13)
  • “Wide China push is seen to obtain industry secrets” (NYT, 6/6/13)
  • “A hard war to wage” (FT, 6/4/13)
• Frivolous Patent Lawsuits (“Patent Trolls”): “FTC is said to plan inquiry of frivolous patent lawsuits” (NYT, 6/20/13)
• Patent Lawsuits Against US Banks: “US banks sued in patents broadside” (FT, 6/24/13)
• Theft of Goldman Secret High Frequency Trading Code:“Questions linger in Goldman Code case” (WSJ, 6/14/13)

May 2013

• Theft of Goldman Secret High Frequency Trading Code:“Second trial of code ace cleared” (WSJ, 5/1/13)

April 2013

• Apple/Samsung Patent Infringement Trial:“Blow after ‘bounce back’ scrolling patent ruled invalid” (NYT, 4/3/13)
• Bratz Doll Litigation:“Judge may not rule on Bratz fee arbitration” (LA Daily Journal, 4/17/13)

March 2013

• Apple/Samsung Patent Infringement Trial:
  • “Judge slices Apple award almost in half” (LA Daily Journal, 3/4/13)
  • “Apple’s $1 billion patent award cut” (WSJ, 3/3/13)
  • “Judge cuts sum owed to Apple over patents” (NYT, 3/3/13)
  • “Judge cuts Apple’s $1-billion Samsung judgement by almost half” (LAT, 3/3/13)
• Bratz Doll Litigation:
  • “Legal war over Bratz could flare up again” (LA Daily Journal, 3/1/13)
  • “MGA-Mattel suit may revive” (LAT, 3/1/13)
• China thrift of US trade secrets: “Quarter of US groups in China claim to be cyber attack victims” (FT, 3/30/13)

February 2013

• Amicus briefs in District Court:  “Lawyers, judges at odds over Amicus briefs in District Court” (LA Daily Journal, 2/1/13)
• Apple/Samsung Patent Infringement Trial:
  • “‘Shareholder democracy’ can mask abuses” (NYT, 2/26/13)
  • “Einhorn wins bid to block Apple vote” (WSJ, 2/23/13)
  • “Apple vote on stock measure is blocked” (LAT, 2/23/13)
  • “Innovation Nation at War” (NYT, 2/9/13)
  • “Following a herd of bulls on Apple” (NYT, 2/9/13)
  • “Apple loses embank hearing bid” (LA Daily Journal, 2/1/13)
• Bratz Doll Litigation:“Mattel profit falls 17% on litigation charge” (WSJ, 2/1/13)
• Patent Infringement:“White House announces anti-theft trade strategy” (LA Daily Journal, 2/21/13)

January 2013

• Apple/Samsung Patent Infringement Trial:
  • “Apple loses another tool against a rival” (LA Daily Journal, 1/31/13)
  • “Judge rules on award to Apple” (WSJ, 1/30/13)
  • “Has Apple lost its cool to Samsung” (WSJ, 1/26/13)
  • “Samsung rides phone wave” (WSJ, 1/25/13)
  • “Galaxy helped Samsung hit record” (FT, 1/9/13)
  • “Samsung forecast is robust” (WSJ, 1/8/13)
• Bratz Doll Litigation:
  • “$172 Million Bratz verdict is reversed” (LA Daily Journal, 1/25/13)
  • “Award is tossed in Bratz lawsuit” (LAT, 1/25/13)
  • “Judges cutback damages owed by Mattel in doll case” (NYT, 1/25/13)

December 2012

• Apple / Nokia / Sony Patent Infringement Trial:
  • “Sony, Nokia team up to beat Apple in patent trial” (LA Daily Journal, 12/17/12)
  • “Apple losses patent case” (WSJ, 12/14/12)
• Apple/Samsung Patent Infringement Trial:
  • “Recent patent office ruling puts Apple on shaky ground” (LA Daily Journal, 12/24/12)
  • “Apple fails to secure injunction” (LA Daily Journal, 12/19/12)
  • “Apple to appeal Samsung ruling” (WSJ, 12/21/12)
  • “Apple’s patent victory may be just a blip” (LAT, 12/20/12)
  • “Samsung ends its push for a European sales ban on some Apple products” (WSJ, 12/19/12)
  • “Samsung ends fight with Apple in Europe” (FT, 12/19/12)
  • “Samsung trims back bid to block Apple in EU” (WSJ, 12/19/12)
  • “Apple’s request denied for Samsung US ban” (WSJ, 12/18/12)
  • “Apple denied Samsung-phone ban” (LAT, 12/18/12)
  • “Apple’s award may be slight” (LAT, 12/7/12)
  • “Apple Samsung war over briefs” (LA Daily Journal, 12/7/12)
  • “Samsung, Apple back in court” (WSJ, 12/6/12)
  • “Apple, Samsung returning to court in patent dispute” (LAT, 12/6/12)
  • “Apple seeks injunction against rival” (LA Daily Journal, 12/4/12)
  • “Samsung demands Apple retrial” (FT, 12/3/12)
• Bratz Doll Litigation:“Mattel fights to shrink big Bratz verdict” (LA Daily Journal, 12/11/12)
• Carnegie Mellon University $1.17 Billion Jury Verdict against Marvel technology Group:
  • “Carnegie Mellon wins $1.17 billion” (LA Daily Journal, 12/27/12)
  • “Record patent verdict” (WSJ, 12/27/12)
  • “Jury awards $1.17 billion in patent suits” (NYT, 12/27/12)
• Google Antitrust Litigation: “Onetime allies in antitrust part ways over Google” (NYT, 12/17/12)

November 2012

• Apple/Google/Motorola Patent Infringement Litigation:
  • “Judge rethinks dismissal of Apple-Motorola lawsuit” (LA Daily Journal, 11/30/12)
  • “Apple – Motorola case won’t go to trial” (LA Daily Journal, 11/7/12)
• Apple/Samsung Patent Infringement Trial:
  • “Samsung tries new ammo against Apple” (LA Daily Journal, 11/20/12)
  • “Apple is told to show Samsung its HTC settlement” (LAT, 11/23/12)
  • “Samsung and Apple can add phones to lawsuit” (WSJ, 11/19)
  • “Apple takes step toward patent peace” (LA Daily Journal, 11/13/12)
  • “Samsung can air juror misconduct claims” (LA Daily Journal, 11/12/12)
  • “As Apple’s battle with HTC ends, smartphone patent fight continues” (NYT, 11/12/12)
  • “Apple saves its big guns for Samsung” (FT, 11/12/12)
  • “Apple patent suit is dismissed” (NYT, 11/6/12)
• Microsoft/Google (Motorola) Patent Trial: “Pivotal patent case heads to court” (WSJ, 11/12/12)
• “Patent Trolls”: “Cisco calls patent trolls racketeers” (WSJ, 11/12/12)

October 2012

• Apple/Samsung Patent Infringement Trial:
  • “Sasmsung posts record profit as HTC falters” (FT, 10/27/12)
  • “Apple bests Samsung on four patent infringement claims before the ITC” (LA Daily Journal, 10/25/12)
  • “Apple patent on scroll back invalidated” (LA Daily Journal, 10/24/12)
  • “Apple loses copyright appeal against Samsung in Britain” (NYT, 10/19/12)
  • “Appeals court vacates injunction of Samsung smartphone” (LA Daily Journal, 10/12/12)
  • “Samsung boosted by smartphone sales” (FT, 10/6/12)
  • “Samsung expects operating profit high” (WSJ, 10/5/12)
  • “Samsung targets juror in request for retrial” (LA Daily Journal, 10/4/12)
  • “Samsung sues over iPhone 5 patent claims” (FT, 10/3/12)
  • “Samsung wins small victory against apple” (LA Daily Journal, 10/3/12)
• [TOP TEN] Patent Infringement Litigation: “The patent, used as a sword” (NYT, 10/9/12)

September 2012

• Apple/Samsung Patent Infringement Trial:
  • “Samsung asks court to remove road block” (LA Daily Journal, 9/24/12)
  • “Apple seeks extra $707m from Samsung” (FT, 9/24/12)
  • “Samsung injunction stays until appellate court ruling” (LA Daily Journal, 9/19/12)
  • “Apple Wins Another Ruling Against Samsung” (LAT, 9/15/12)
  • “After verdict, assessing the Samsung strategy in South Korea” (NYT, 9/3/12)
  • “Apple targets Samsung big seller” (LAT, 9/2/12)
  • “Tokyo court hands win to Sansung over Apple” (NYT, 9/1/12)
  • “Payday concerns for Apple investors” (FT, 9/4/12)
  • “Myriad Apple rulings grow as Tokyo court backs Samsung” (LAT, 9/1/12)
• Bergstein v. Stroock: “Firms accuses of sabotaging film financier” (LA Daily Journal, 9/13/12)
• Document Destruction: “Rambus faulted for destroying documents” (WSJ, 9/25/12)
• Goldman Programmer Theft of Source Code Trial:
  • “Programmer’s case is mater of (legal) code” (WSJ, 9/28/12)
  • “Another Round” (NYT, 9/28/12) [Great Lawyer Quote: “He left Russia for freedom, Justice, and the American way, and he got Franz Kakfa and Goldman Sachs”]
  • “Former programmer demands that Goldman cover his legal fees” (NYT, 9/26/12)
• LG Display/ Samsung Patent Infringement Lawsuit: “Samsung faces domestic patent lawsuit from LG” (FT, 9/28/12)

August 2012

• Apple / Google: “Next Apple patent foe Google” (WSJ, 8/31/12)
• Apple/Samsung Patent Infringement Trial:
  • “Samsung boosted as hearing date set” (FT, 8/30/12)
  • “American law is patent nonsense” (FT, 8/29/12)
  • “The jury has spoken: Think different” (WSJ, 8/29/12)
  • “Samsung vows to fight Apple’s bid to ban 8 smartphones” (LAT, 8/29/12)
  • “Fat lady has not yet ‘Sung” (FT, 8/28/12)
  • “Apple win sends waves through techs” (FT, 8/28/12)
  • “Samsung says Apple abused US patent laws” (FT, 8/28/12)
  • “Samsung verdict: Do Google’s Motorola patents shield Android from Apple?“” (LAT, 8/28/12)
  • “Blame a dysfunctional patent system for Apple vs. Samsung verdict” (LAT, 8/28/12)
  • “Samsung case puts Apple closer to fight with Google” (NYT, 8/28/12)
  • “Apple’s win casts rivals out of Eden” (WSJ, 8/28/12)
  • “Apple seeks US Sales ban on eight Samsung devices” (WSJ, 8/28/12)
  • “Apples lawsuit sends a message to Google” (WSJ, 8/27/12)
  • “Patent bet turns sour for Korean behemoth” (WSJ, 8/27/12)
  • [TOP TEN] “How Apple got its case across” (WSJ, 8/27/12)
  • “Apple victory shifts power balance” (WSJ, 8/27/12)
  • “After legal victory Apple patently rules on mobile devises” (WSJ, 8/27/12)
  • “Apple case muddies the future of innovations” (NYT, 8/27/12)
  • “Jurors in Apple case delve into emails and more” (LAT, 8/27/12)
  • “Apple awarded $1 Billion” (LAT, 8/25/12)
  • “Apple patent ruling redraws the battle lines” (FT, 8/27/12)
  • “Apple Chief rallies staff after win over rival” (FT, 8/27/12)
  • [TOP TEN] “A Verdict that alters an Industry” (NYT, 8/25/12)
  • “High Stakes after Apple Verdict” (LAT, 8/26/12)
  • “A Patent War in your Pocket” (NYT, 8/26/12)
  • “Jurors gives Apple a decisive victory in a Patents case” (NYT, 8/25/12)
  • “Korean Court helps Samsung” (WSJ, 8/25/12)
  • “Samsung and Apple hit by South Korean ban” (FT, 8/25/12)
  • “Samsung or Apple: Who’s right?” (WSJ, 8/24/12)
  • “Apple jury hears closing arguments in iPhone trial” (LA Daily Journal, 8/22/12)
  • “Evidence destruction at issue” (LA Daily Journal, 8/21/12)
  • “Apple, Samsung take parting shots in court battle” (WSJ, 8/22/12)
  • “Apple vs Samsung trial over patents wraps up” (LAT, 8/22/12)
  • “Testimony concludes in smart phone trial” (LA Daily Journal, 8/20/12)
  • “Apple-Samsung judge presses lawyers to settle” (LA Daily Journal, 8/16/12)
  • “Samsung switches to offense in patent trial” (LA Daily Journal, 8/15/12)
  • “In Apple’s patent case, tech shifts may follow” (NYT, 8/20/12)
  • “Jury’s turn in Apple-Samsung trial” (WSJ, 8/20/12
  • “Apple winds up patent case” (WSJ, 8/18/12)
  • “Patent trial turns to damages” (WSJ, 8/17/12)
  • “Judge urges Apple and Samsung to settle their patent dispute” (NYT, 8/16/12)
  • “Samsung tries to cut its potential bill in Apple trial” (WSJ, 8/16/12)
  • “Celebrity lawyer in Apple Samsung trial forgets a few details” (LA Daily Journal, 8/10/12)
  • “Apple calls witnesses to bolster infringement case against Samsung” (LA Daily Journal, 8/8/12)
  • “Samsung goes on offensive in patent trial against Apple” (LA Daily Journal, 8/14/12)
  • “Apple calls last set of witnesses” (WSJ, 8/13/12)
  • “Apple grills Samsung executive in trial” (WSJ, 8/7/12)
  • “Judge chastises Samsung Lawyer but doesn’t punish client” (LA Daily Journal, 8/6/12)
  • “Court battle gives glimpse into Apple’s core” (FT, 8/6/12)
  • “At a trial, Apple spills some secrets” (NYT, 8/6/12)
  • “Judge warns Samsung over Apple evidence” (FT, 8/3/12)
  • “Judge rejects Apple’s request for sanctions against Samsung” (LAT, 8/3/12)
  • “Patent war pits two legal stars” (WSJ, 8/3/12)
  • “Apple requests sanction for Samsung” (WSJ, 8/3/12)
  • “Samsung’s conduct spurs adverse jury instruction” (LA Daily Journal, 8/2/12)
  • “Apple and Samsung lock horns over patents” (FT, 8/1/12)
  • “Apple Samsung trial opens” (LA Daily Journal, 8/1/12)
• Blackberry/RIM Appeal: “BlackBerry maker hoping to overturn $147 patent verdict” (LA Daily Journal, 8/10/12)
• Brocade Communications Systems: “Brocade wins copyright, patent infringement case from San Jose jury” (LA Daily Journal, 8/8/12)
• Criminal Trade Secrets Prosecution of Motorola Solutions Software Engineer (Jin): “Engineer gets four years in Motorola secrets case” (WSJ, 8/30/12)
• Goldman Programmer Theft of Source Code Trial: “Ex-Goldman programmer again faces theft charges” (NYT, 8/10/12)

July 2012

• Apple/Samsung Patent Infringement Trial: “Design and drama mark first day in Apple-Samsung trial” (NYT, 7/31/12)

June 2012

• Bratz Doll Litigation: “Insurers file suit over Bratz legal fees” (LA Daily Journal, 6/19/12)